Skip to main content

#9 Biosocial Theory

 


Module #9

Lesson Title: Biosocial Theory

 

Lesson Objectives:

At the end of this module, you should be able to:

1.  discuss the concepts of biosocial theory; and

2.  explain its sub-concepts.


BIOSOCIAL THEORY

This theory viewed that both thought and behavior have biological and social bases. Biosocial theorists believe that it is the interaction between predisposition and environment that produces criminality. Children born into a disadvantaged environment often do not have the social and familial support they need to overcome their handicaps. Lack of family support can have long-term physical consequences. For example, a child’s neural pathways may be damaged by repeated child neglect or abuse. Once experiences are ingrained, the brain “remembers,” and a pattern of electrochemical activation is established, which remains present across the lifespan.

Contemporary biosocial theorists seek to explain the onset of antisocial behaviors, such as aggression and violence, by focusing on the physical qualities of the offenders. Their research efforts appear to be concentrated in three (3) distinct areas of study: biochemical factors, neurological dysfunction, and genetic influences (Siegel et. al, 2007).

 

1.  Biochemical Factors

Stresses about the relationship between antisocial behavior and biochemical makeup and that body chemistry can govern behavior and personality, including levels of aggression and depression.  For example, exposure to lead in the environment and subsequent lead ingestion has been linked to antisocial behaviors (Siegel et. al, 2007).


1.1  Hormonal Levels

Another area of  biochemical research emphasizes that  antisocial behavior allegedly peaks    in the teenage years because hormonal activity is at its highest level during this period.

Research also suggests that increased levels of the male androgen testosterone are responsible for excessive levels of violence among teenage boys.

 

2.  Neurological Dysfunction

Another concentration of biosocial theory is neurological, or brain and nervous system, structure of offenders. Studies measure indicators of system functioning, such as brain waves, heart  rate, arousal levels, skin conductance and attention span, cognitive ability, and spatial learning, and then compared them to measures of antisocial behavior. The neuroendocrine system, which controls the brain chemistry, is the key to understanding violence and aggression. Imbalance in the central nervous system’s chemical and hormonal activity has been linked to antisocial behavior and drug abuse (Siegel et. al, 2007). Neurotransmitters are chemical compounds that influence brain activity. Research suggests that abnormal levels of some neurotransmitters – including dopamine, serotonin, and monoamine oxidase – are related to aggression and violence. For example, people with a history of impulsive violence often have a reduction in the function of the serotonin system (Badaway, 2003).

2.1  Minimal Brain Dysfunction

It is defined as the damage to the brain itself that causes antisocial behavior injurious to the individual’s lifestyle and social adjustment. Children who manifest behavior disturbances may have identifiable neurological deficits, such as damage to the hemispheres of the brain. One specific type of MBD is Learning Disability, a term that has been defined by the National Advisory Committee on Handicapped Children. Learning disability is a neurological dysfunction that prevents an individual from learning to his or her potential (Siegel et. al, 2007).

 

3.  Genetic Influences

Focuses on the idea that individuals who share genes are alike in personality regardless of how they are reared, whereas the rearing environment induces little or no personality resemblance. The Father of Criminology Cesare Lombroso often believed that antisocial behavior had a genetic basis based on his theory that some people are “born criminals.” Some biosocial theorists, for example, stated that certain violent personality traits – including psychopathy – may be inherited (Carey and DiLalla, 1994).

 

3.1  Parent-Child Similarities

A number of studies found out that parental criminality and deviance do, in fact, powerfully influence delinquent behavior. Donald J. West and David P. Farrington made a study and they found out that a significant number of delinquent youths have criminal fathers. West and Farrington’s study has been supported by Rochester Youth Development Study. The latter found an intergenerational continuity in anti-social behavior: Criminal fathers produce delinquent sons who grow up to have delinquent children themselves (Siegel et. al, 2007).

3.2  Sibling and Twin Similarities

Biosocial theorists have compared the behavior of twins and non-twin siblings and found out  that the twins, who share more genetic material, are also more similar in their behavior. When comparing identical monozygotic (MZ) twins with same-sex fraternal dizygotic (DZ) twins; although the former have an identical genetic makeup, the latter share only about 50% of their genetic combinations. Reviews of twin studies found that in all cases, MZ twins have delinquent and antisocial behavior patterns more similar than that of DZ twins (Siegel et. al, 2007).

3.3 Adoption Studies

Sarnoff Mednick and Bernard Hutchings were forced to conclude based on their study that genetics played at least some role in creating delinquent tendencies. Adoptees share many of the behavioural and intellectual characteristics of their biological parents despite the social and environmental conditions found in their adoptive homes (Siegel et. al, 2007).



Q1. Is biosocial theory the same with biological theory?


Answer: No, it is not. Biosocial speaks of the combination of both genes and the environment as one of the causes of crime while biological theory speaks only on the internal forces which force the person to commit crime.


Q2. If the parents are criminal, does it also follow that the children will become criminal? 


Answer: If the genes of the parents are dominant then there is a big possibility that the children will inherit the genes of their parents.

Q3. Who side has the greatest factor for the child to inherit one’s genes? Is it from the father or the




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

#2 Concept of Human Behavior

Module#2 Lesson Title: Concept of Human Behavior Lesson Objectives: At the end of this module, you should be able to: 1. explain the concept of human behavior; 2. examine your own self; and 3. discuss the different perspectives of human behavior. A. LESSON PREVIEW/REVIEW Introduction (2 mins) Good day! How was your day? Hope everything goes well. Welcome to our topic this morning entitled the “ Concept of Human Behavior ”. Our topic today is related still with the previous topic “Philosophy of Social Norms and Ethics: Human Mind and Behavior” since it also talks about behavior, to be specific the different perspectives of human behavior. The learning objectives of this lesson are: first you are going to explain the concept of human behavior, second, you will examine your own self, and lastly, you have to discuss the different perspectives of human behavior using your own words. Are you now ready? Alright, let’s proceed with this first activity! B.MAIN LESSON Activity 2: Content Notes (...

#13 Family Studies (Jukes & Kallikak Family)

  Module #13 Lesson Objectives: At the end of this module, you should be able to: 1.   create concept maps of the family line of the Jukes’ and Kallikak’s Family; and apply the theory in real-life situations. JUKES FAMILY  Advocates of the inheritance school, such as Henry Goddard, Richard Dugdale, and Arthur Estabrook, traced several generations of crime-prone families (referred to by pseudonyms such as the “Jukes” and the “Kallikaks”), finding evidence that criminal tendencies were based on genetics. Their conclusion: traits deemed socially inferior could be passed down from generation to generation through inheritance (Siegel, 2011). According to Richard Louis Dugdale in his book, “The Jukes": A Study in Crime, Pauperism, Disease and Heredity, Also Further Studies of Criminals, stated the origin of the stock of the “Jukes”, there was a hunter, a fisher, a hard drinker, and a jolly-man named Max who was also a descendant of the Dutchess settler. Two of Max’s s...

#6 The Formula of Crime Causation

Module #6 Lesson Title:   The Formula of Crime Causation Lesson Objectives: At the end of this module, you should be able to: 1. identify the types of crime classification; and 2. state briefly the formula of crime causation. Introduction (2 mins) Have a tremendous day to you there at your home! Our topic for today is all about “The Formula of Crime Causation.” Do you know what the criminal formula of the existence of crime is? You may ask yourself. If you knew then very well! Yes, our topic on the previous module was all about the Development of Theory. If you’re going to analyze our topic today it is still connected with the previous since today you will uncover the formula of the existence of crime which will later be discussed on theories of crime causation. The learning objectives are: a) you should be able to state briefly the formula of crime causation; and b) judge what element is significant for a crime not to happen. Are you ready? Alright, you may begin with this first a...