Skip to main content

#16 Study on Phrenology

 


Lesson Objectives:

At the end of this module, you should be able to:

1.  summarize the concept of phrenology; and 

2.   identify what part of the brain that shows your strength and weakness.


PHRENOLOGY

 

Phrenology posited that bumps on the head were indications of psychological propensities (Adler et al, 2010).

Phrenology is the study of the conformation of the skull as indicative of mental faculties and traits of character, especially according to the hypotheses of Franz Joseph Gall (1758–1828), and such 19th-century adherents as Johann Kaspar Spurzheim (1776–1832) and George Combe (1788–1858) (https://www.britannica.com/topic/phrenology).

Phrenology was a theory of brain and science of character reading, what the nineteenth- century phrenologists called "the only true science of mind." Phrenology was derived from the theories of the distinctive German-French anatomist and physiologist Franz Joseph Gall. The basic tenets of Gall's system were:

1.  The brain is the organ of the mind.

2.  The mind is composed of multiple distinct, innate faculties.

3.  Because they are distinct, each faculty must have a separate seat or "organ" in the brain.

4.  The size of an organ, other things being equal, is a measure of its power.

5.  The shape of the brain is determined by the development of the various organs.

6.  As the skull takes its shape from the brain, the surface of the skull can be read as an accurate index of psychological aptitudes and tendencies (Wyhe, 2000).

 

His collaboration with his pupil Johann Kaspar Spurzheim, who served as research assistant and collaborator,  which began in 1800,  led him to the development  of  his theories concerning    brain localization and phrenology, which he initially referred to as cranioscopy. He characterized his primary goal to develop a functional anatomy and physiology of the brain as well as a revised psychology of personality as "organology." Gall ultimately identified 27 discrete brain "centres" of behaviour, 25 of which have never been confirmed to exist.

Gall's lectures on cranioscopy became very popular, and it was his followers who gave his doctrine the name "phrenology". Against the church, however, it helped him little that his revolutionary concept was a pioneering work. Gall offended religious leaders and scientists alike. The Church considered his theory as contrary to religion. That the mind, created by God, should have a physical seat in brain matter, was anathema (a curse) (http://www.whonamedit.com/doctor.cfm/1018.html).

 

Phrenology was re-introduced to Britain by the American "phrenological Fowlers" Lorenzo  Niles Fowler (1811-1896) in the 1860s and 1870s. The Fowlers had begun lecturing and reading heads for fees in New York in the 1830s. Their phrenology was wholly borrowed from the British modifications of Gall's system Wyhe (2000).

In the United States, the views on phrenology were supported by physician Charles Caldwell (1772-1853), who searched for evidence that brain tissue and cells regulate human action (Adler et al, 2010).

Neuroscientists today are using their new tools to revisit and explore the idea that different personality traits are localized in different brain regions. Two of the leaders in this new field are psychologists Colin DeYoung of the University of Minnesota and Jeremy Gray of Yale, who have been using  a  brain  scanner  to  search  for  evidence  of  the  so-called  ―big  five‖  personality  traits.  There  is growing scientific consensus that every human personality is a unique mix of just five core attributes: extraversion, neuroticism, agreeableness, openness/intellect, and conscientiousness.

 

Take extraversion, for example. Extraversion includes qualities like assertiveness and sociability and talkativeness—all traits having to do with positive emotions and rewarding social experiences. Based on this, the scientists guessed that the most extraverted people would have larger than normal brain regions associated with sensitivity to reward.

 

Scientists found that neuroticism—a tendency toward negative emotions like irritability and anxiety—was associated with the brain regions involved in threat and punishment. Agreeableness—a catchall for altruism, empathy, cooperation and compassion—correlated with regions known to process those traits. And, finally, the most conscientious volunteers had unusually large brain structures involved in “executive” powers like future planning and following complex rules. In short, the brain studies lent strong support to the idea that the big five personality traits have a biological foundation.




*********


Q1. Phrenology is claimed to be a pseudoscience. What does pseudoscience mean?

Answer: Pseudoscience consists of statements, beliefs, or practices that are claimed to be both scientific and factual but are incompatible with the scientific method.

Q2. Is this theory reliable in all instances?

Answer: The theory holds some true in some other persons and may not be true in some persons.

Q3. What does a critic say about this theory?


Answer: Nobody really believes that the shapes of our heads are a window into our personalities anymore. But despite the fact that it has fallen into disrepute, phrenology as a science has never really been subjected to rigorous, neuroscientific testing


=====END=====





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

#13 Family Studies (Jukes & Kallikak Family)

  Module #13 Lesson Objectives: At the end of this module, you should be able to: 1.   create concept maps of the family line of the Jukes’ and Kallikak’s Family; and apply the theory in real-life situations. JUKES FAMILY  Advocates of the inheritance school, such as Henry Goddard, Richard Dugdale, and Arthur Estabrook, traced several generations of crime-prone families (referred to by pseudonyms such as the “Jukes” and the “Kallikaks”), finding evidence that criminal tendencies were based on genetics. Their conclusion: traits deemed socially inferior could be passed down from generation to generation through inheritance (Siegel, 2011). According to Richard Louis Dugdale in his book, “The Jukes": A Study in Crime, Pauperism, Disease and Heredity, Also Further Studies of Criminals, stated the origin of the stock of the “Jukes”, there was a hunter, a fisher, a hard drinker, and a jolly-man named Max who was also a descendant of the Dutchess settler. Two of Max’s sons marri

#2 Concept of Human Behavior

Module#2 Lesson Title: Concept of Human Behavior Lesson Objectives: At the end of this module, you should be able to: 1. explain the concept of human behavior; 2. examine your own self; and 3. discuss the different perspectives of human behavior. A. LESSON PREVIEW/REVIEW Introduction (2 mins) Good day! How was your day? Hope everything goes well. Welcome to our topic this morning entitled the “ Concept of Human Behavior ”. Our topic today is related still with the previous topic “Philosophy of Social Norms and Ethics: Human Mind and Behavior” since it also talks about behavior, to be specific the different perspectives of human behavior. The learning objectives of this lesson are: first you are going to explain the concept of human behavior, second, you will examine your own self, and lastly, you have to discuss the different perspectives of human behavior using your own words. Are you now ready? Alright, let’s proceed with this first activity! B.MAIN LESSON Activity 2: Content Notes (

#6 The Formula of Crime Causation

Module #6 Lesson Title:   The Formula of Crime Causation Lesson Objectives: At the end of this module, you should be able to: 1. identify the types of crime classification; and 2. state briefly the formula of crime causation. Introduction (2 mins) Have a tremendous day to you there at your home! Our topic for today is all about “The Formula of Crime Causation.” Do you know what the criminal formula of the existence of crime is? You may ask yourself. If you knew then very well! Yes, our topic on the previous module was all about the Development of Theory. If you’re going to analyze our topic today it is still connected with the previous since today you will uncover the formula of the existence of crime which will later be discussed on theories of crime causation. The learning objectives are: a) you should be able to state briefly the formula of crime causation; and b) judge what element is significant for a crime not to happen. Are you ready? Alright, you may begin with this first activ